![]() ![]() Just as a compound sentence is a sentence with more than one subject or predicate, a compound question is a question which has more than one part. ![]() For example, a negative question might say something like, “So, am I not correct in assuming that you have never not said you don’t support America?” Would you instantly understand the meaning of that question? Or would you need to run it over in your mind a few times first, carefully unpacking the confusing verbiage? The latter is true for pretty much everybody, so you can see why negative questions are problematic.Īnd last but not least, we have compound questions. Instead, negative questions are those which are confusing in their organization because they rely heavily on the use of double negatives. Negative questions are not questions that are negative in tone or questions that don’t sound very friendly. A good example of a vague question might be, “How do you feel about war?” Because there have been multitudinous wars throughout history, some of which have wreaked horrific destruction, and some of which have saved the world, that question is overwhelmingly vague. Vague questions are exactly what they sound like: questions that are too open-ended and undefined for any real clarity to be achieved through conversation. Vague questions are next on the list because they’re also a repeat offender. In fact, they might even feel so resentful that they might spit in your drink or make your coffee incorrectly again to pay you back for being rude to them. And they certainly won’t be motivated to help you get what you want. After all, if you yell at someone and call them stupid, they probably won’t like you very much. But even if you don’t care about being compassionate towards others, that response is also unhelpful because it’s counterproductive. For starters, that response isn’t kind and it isn’t treating other people the way you would want to be treated. But is it the right response? Not really. Is that an understandable response, given your frustration? Sure. Maybe you called them stupid and told them they were doing a terrible job and demanded a refund and a free coffee. Imagine that you really did yell at that Dunkin Donuts employee. To understand why, let’s consider a different version of this scenario. Your gut instinct says that you’re upset and you have the right to tell the world about it! But the author observes that acting on that gut instinct is actually counterproductive. Jointly decide how to decide.That’s your gut instinct talking. When decision making authority is unclear, use your best dialogue skills to get meaning into the pool. If you don't openly talk about who decides and why, and your opinions vary widely, you're likely to end up in a heated battle that can only be resolved in court. That's part of the meaning you need to discuss. All of the participants need to get their meaning into the pool-including their opinions about who should make the final choice. When there is no clear line of authority, deciding how to decide can be quite difficult. Deciding what decisions to turn over and when to do it is part of their stewardship. When you're in a position of authority, you decide which method of decision making you'll use.both leaders and parents turn more decisions over to their direct reports and children when they warrant the responsibility, but it's still the authority figure who decides what method of decision making to employ.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |